National Long Term Care
 Empowering Consumers, Protecting Families!
Call Toll Free: 1-877-850-0211 

Even More Reasons to Get a Move On

March 5th, 2010 Posted in Considering Risk Factors | No Comments »

New York Times
March 2, 2010
Personal Health
By Jane E. Brody

“I’m 86 and have walked every day of my life. The public needs to wake up and move.”

“I’m 83 going on 84 years! I find that daily aerobics and walking are fine. But these regimens neglect the rest of the body, and I find the older you get the more attention they need.”

These are two of many comments from readers of my Jan. 12 column on the secrets of successful aging. At the risk of sounding like a broken record, a new series of studies prompts me to again review the myriad benefits to body, mind and longevity of regular physical activity for people of all ages.

Regular exercise is the only well-established fountain of youth, and it’s free. What, I’d like to know, will persuade the majority of Americans who remain sedentary to get off their duffs and give their bodies the workout they deserve? My hope is that every new testimonial to the value of exercise will win a few more converts until everyone is doing it.

In a commentary on the new studies, published Jan. 25 in The Archives of Internal Medicine, two geriatricians, Dr. Marco Pahor of the University of Florida and Dr. Jeff Williamson of Winston-Salem, N.C., pointed to “the power of higher levels of physical activity to aid in the prevention of late-life disability owing to either cognitive impairment or physical impairment, separately or together.”

“Physical inactivity,” they wrote, “is one of the strongest predictors of unsuccessful aging for older adults and is perhaps the root cause of many unnecessary and premature admissions to long-term care.”

They noted that it had long been “well established that higher quantities of physical activity have beneficial effects on numerous age-related conditions such as osteoarthritis, falls and hip fracture, cardiovascular disease, respiratory diseases, cancer, diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, low fitness and obesity, and decreased functional capacity.”

One of the new studies adds mental deterioration, with exercise producing “a significantly reduced risk of cognitive impairment after two years for participants with moderate or high physical activity” who were older than 55 when the study began.

Most early studies demonstrating the benefits of exercise were done with men. Now a raft of recent studies has shown that active women reap comparable rewards.

Research-Based Evidence

Sedentary skeptics are fond of saying that of course exercise is associated with good health as one ages; the people who exercise are healthy to begin with. But studies in which some participants are randomly assigned to a physical activity program and others to a placebo (like simply being advised to exercise) call their bluff. Even less exacting observational studies, like the Nurses’ Health Study, take into account the well-being of participants at enrollment.

Thus, in one of the new studies, Dr. Qi Sun of Harvard School of Public Health and co-authors reported that among the 13,535 nurses who were healthy when they joined the study in 1986, those who reported higher levels of activity in midlife were far more likely to still be healthy a decade or more later at age 70. The study found that physical activity increased the nurses’ chances of remaining healthy regardless of body weight, although those who were both lean and active had “the highest odds of successful survival.”

Taking the benefits of exercise one system at a time, here is what recent studies have shown, including several published in The Archives of Internal Medicine in December.

Cancer. In a review last year of 52 studies of exercise and colon cancer, researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis concluded that people who were most active were 21 percent less likely to develop the disease than those who were least active, possibly because activity helps to move waste more quickly through the bowel.

The risk of breast cancer, too, is about 16 percent lower among physically active women, perhaps because exercise reduces tissue exposure to insulin-like growth factor, a known cancer promoter.

Indirectly, exercise may protect postmenopausal women against cancers of the endometrium, pancreas, colon and esophagus, as well as breast cancer, by helping them keep their weight down.

Osteoporosis and fragility. Weak bones and muscles increase the risk of falls and fractures and an inability to perform the tasks of daily life. Weight-bearing aerobic activities like brisk walking and weight training to increase muscle strength can reduce or even reverse bone loss. In one of the new studies, German researchers who randomly assigned women 65 and older to either an 18-month exercise regimen or a wellness program demonstrated that exercise significantly increased bone density and reduced the risk of falls. And at any age, even in people over 100, weight training improves the size and quality of muscles, thus increasing the ability to function independently.

Cardiovascular disease. Aerobic exercise has long been established as an invaluable protector of the heart and blood vessels. It increases the heart’s ability to work hard, lowers blood pressure and raises blood levels of HDL-cholesterol, which acts as a cleansing agent in arteries. As a result, active individuals of all ages have lower rates of heart attacks and strokes.

Though early studies were conducted only among men, in a 2002 study published in The New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. JoAnn E. Manson and colleagues found that among 73,743 initially healthy women ages 50 to 79, walking briskly for 30 minutes a day five days a week, as well as more vigorous exercise, substantially reduced the risk of heart attacks and other cardiovascular events.

In another study, women who walked at least one hour a day were 40 percent less likely to suffer a stroke than women who walked less than an hour a week.

Diabetes. Moderate activity has been shown to lower the risk of developing diabetes even in women of normal weight. A 16-year study of 68,907 initially healthy female nurses found that those who were sedentary had twice the risk of developing diabetes, and those who were both sedentary and obese had 16 times the risk when compared with normal-weight women who were active.

Another study that randomly assigned 3,234 prediabetic men and women to modest physical activity (at least 150 minutes a week) found exercise to be more effective than the drug metformin at preventing full-blown diabetes.

Dementia. As the population continues to age, perhaps the greatest health benefit of regular physical activity will turn out to be its ability to prevent or delay the loss of cognitive functions. The new study of 3,485 healthy men and women older than 55 found that those who were physically active three or more times a week were least likely to become cognitively impaired.

One study conducted in Australia and published in September 2008 in The Journal of the American Medical Association randomly assigned 170 volunteers who reported memory problems to a six-month program of physical activity or health education. A year and a half later, the exercise group showed “a modest improvement in cognition.” Various other studies have confirmed the value of exercise in helping older people maintain useful short-term memory, enabling them to plan, schedule and multitask, as well as store information and use it effectively.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Young Workers Must Face Realities of Long-Term Care

February 10th, 2010 Posted in General Long Term Care Information | No Comments »

By Michael Hogue

Retirement, New York Times October 22, 2008

A Special Section

Strategies for retirement in a troubled economy.

MOST of the nation’s 78 million baby boomers are watching their parents grow old. While investigating caretaking options for their parents, they should also be thinking about their own old age and planning how they will pay for nursing homes or home health aides for themselves, experts say. With life expectancy steadily rising, the odds are that they will eventually need some help with basic functions, like dressing or walking, maybe for decades.

But many boomers are ignoring this prospect.

“You’ve got your 401(k) to fund, you’ve got rising health care premiums, gasoline is up, groceries are up, said Randall K. Abbott, a senior consultant in the Boston office of the benefits consulting firm Watson Wyatt. “Folks tend to look at their wallets and decide it’s something they can’t think about right now.” Besides, he said, “people just don’t believe it’s going to happen to them.”

If they were to pay attention, they would learn that Medicare does not cover these ongoing, nonmedical services. Medicaid does, but it has tightened its rules, making it harder for middle-income people to qualify. That leaves essentially two choices: pay cash or buy long-term care insurance.

Long-term care insurance covers services for people who are unable to perform two or more activities of daily living. It can pay for a nursing home, assisted living facility, home health aide, adult day care and family respite (someone to fill in for a family member who is caring for the insured person).

And it is not just for the elderly; young people who are paralyzed by car accidents, for instance, often need home care.

About seven million of these policies had been sold as of Dec. 31, 2007, with sales increasing slightly over the past year, according to Limra International, a trade group in Windsor, Conn. The choices among these plans can be mind-boggling. Here are some critical issues to consider:

DO I REALLY NEED THIS COVERAGE?

Buying insurance is always a bet on probability. For long-term care, there are four basic questions to ask:

If I don’t buy insurance, how much money can I afford to spend on this care from my own assets and income? AARP reported that the average cost of a nursing home in the United States last year was about $214 a day; a home health aide was around $19 an hour.

Do I have alternatives? Are there friends or relatives who would take care of me — without charge?

What is the likelihood that I will need this care? (This is, admittedly, an uncomfortable question.) Does my family have a history of debilitating chronic illness, like Alzheimer’s disease? Or, on the other hand, do I have a heart problem that makes it unlikely that I will live long enough to use the benefit?

Can I afford the annual premiums, which can top $2,000? If someone’s assets or income is less than $40,000, “most likely you would be better off relying on Medicaid,” said Malcolm Cheung, vice president of long-term care product and risk management at the Prudential Insurance Company.

WHEN SHOULD I BUY IT?

Experts suggest that people buy policies while in their 40s to mid-50s, mainly because premiums rise with age, roughly doubling every 10 years. For a standard policy at New York Life Insurance Company, the annual rate is $1,041 at age 50, $1,941 at age 60 and $3,984 at age 70.

If buying at age 40 is good, why not start at 30? “Your first savings should be to take care of income replacement for retirement,” said Lawrence Singer, a senior vice president at the Segal Company, a benefits consulting firm in New York City. Another reason: “The likelihood of having a claim is really remote in the 30s, 40s and 50s,” he said.

But an applicant can also be too old. The cutoff at some major insurers is age 79; New York Life will sign new policies for those up to age 85, but with limited benefits.

WHERE CAN I GET IT?

“Look for it at the work site first,” Mr. Singer said. More than one-third of companies now offer long-term care insurance as a benefit, doubling the number from 10 years ago, according to Hewitt Associates, a benefits consulting firm in Lincolnshire, Ill.

Employer-based plans have multiple advantages, experts say. Mr. Abbott of Watson Wyatt noted that the group rates are typically 5 to 15 percent lower than retail and “they often have features and benefits that are more difficult to find in individual plans.” Moreover, the employer will have vetted the insurance carrier. One more advantage: policy owners will not need medical screening.

For those who have to buy coverage on their own, how can they be sure the company will still be around when they need the benefits, 20 years from now? One way is to check its standing with a rating agency like Standard & Poor’s or A. M. Best Company.

About two dozen states — including New York, New Jersey and Connecticut — have extended-coverage “partnerships” that coordinate private insurance with Medicaid. Normally, if people still need help after exhausting their insurance benefits, they must pay out of pocket until nearly all of their assets are gone before Medicaid will step in. With these state programs, however, they can qualify for Medicaid while preserving more assets. (The amount they can preserve depends on the policy they select.)

HOW MUCH COVERAGE SHOULD I GET?

The typical policy is written as a formula — X dollars per day of Y-type coverage for Z years — although in practice it is more flexible. “It’s really a pot of dollars,” said Mr. Cheung of Prudential. If a policy covers $200 a day at a nursing home for five years, and the policyholder ends up in a home that costs only $150, the coverage can continue beyond five years until the policy has paid out $365,000 ($200 times 365 times 5).

The advantage of this formula is that it helps people calculate how much coverage to buy by breaking the choice into pieces.

How many years of coverage? For nursing homes, five years is a common amount, but people can buy anywhere from two years to unlimited time. Thomas Stinson, president of the long-term care business at Genworth Financial in Richmond, Va., a large insurance provider, says the average nursing home stay is two and a half years.

And how much money per day? That is fairly easy to calculate, because AARP and many insurance companies track average costs state by state. Consumers can also look up the facilities they are interested in. The catch: “You really need to think about where you’re going to be retired, and the average cost of nursing homes there,” rather than the cost where you live now, said Robert Schlau, a senior consultant for Towers Perrin, a benefits consulting firm based in Stamford, Conn. The fees can vary dramatically — from $33.50 a day in Louisiana to $237 in Alaska, according to AARP.

Genworth’s typical customer buys four years of coverage at $200 per day. At Prudential, the average is five years at $140 a day.

Since today’s average cost is sure to grow by the time most buyers actually use the benefit, it is important to add inflation protection. A policyholder can increase coverage every few years, with a corresponding rise in the premium, but most experts prefer policies that automatically raise the benefit over time, even though they charge a higher premium from the start.

If it is not done automatically, “our concern is that people often pass on taking the option,” said Mr. Stinson of Genworth, which sells only the automatic type. There is some dispute as to which approach costs more in the end.

WILL I BE ABLE TO GET INSURANCE?

Insurers reject 15 to 20 percent of applicants — mainly those “likely to need long-term care soon,” Mr. Cheung said. The most common red flags are obesity, severe diabetes, cancer within the past five years, arthritis, Parkinson’s disease and mental cognition problems, along with age limits.

That’s another reason to apply at a younger age. “Your insurability is exponentially higher,” Mr. Stinson said.

The good news is that a family history of these conditions does not count. “It’s hard to reject somebody based on a predisposition to something they don’t personally have,” said Dennis M. O’Brien, senior vice president for long-term coverage at New York Life.

CAN THE COMPANY RAISE MY PREMIUM?

Yes, with regulatory approval. However, rates must be raised for a whole class of policyholders, not on an individual basis, and it is rare. Genworth said it increased premiums only once in 35 years, while New York Life said that it had never done so.

SHOULD BOTH PARTNERS GET COVERAGE?

Companies often give a 30 or 40 percent spousal discount on both policies, so it can be cost-effective to buy coverage together. But if a couple can afford only one policy, Mr. Abbott said, “focus on the one who’s more likely to have the need.”

There is an important difference between long-term care insurance and other types. With auto or fire or major medical coverage, the policyholder hopes never actually to use the benefit. With long-term care, the policyholder hopes to live a long healthy life that may end with a brief nursing home stay or some home care, rather than never living long enough to require the care at all.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Limited Liability & Professional Corporations

February 7th, 2010 Posted in Tax Issues | No Comments »

Generally
A Limited Liability Company is a statutory business that may be treated as a corporation, a partnership, or a sole proprietorship for tax purposes.

As a result, to determine the tax implications of LLC-purchased Long-Term Care Insurance, one must first determine by which method the LLC is treated for federal income tax purposes.

Thus it follows:

  • A LLC treated as Sole Proprietorship would look to the Sole Proprietor regulations for guidance;
  • A LLC treated as a Partnership would look to the Partnership regulations for guidance; and
  • A LLC treated as a Corporation would look to the Corporation regulations for guidance.

Professional Corporations/ Professional Associations (PCs/PAs)

Generally
Professional Corporations and Associations have the ability to select the method by which the entity will be treated for federal income tax purposes.

Generally, Professional Corporations may elect to be treated as either a C-Corporation or an S-Corporation. The status is elected by the entity.

As a result, to determine the tax implications of PC-purchased Long-Term Care Insurance, one must first determine by which method the PC is treated for federal income tax purposes.

Thus it follows:

  • A PC treated as C-Corporation would look to the C-Corporation regulations for guidance; and
  • A PC treated as an S-Corporation would look to the S-Corporation regulations for guidance.
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

S-Corporations

February 7th, 2010 Posted in Tax Issues | No Comments »

Deductibility of Employer-Paid Premiums
For purposes of determining tax liabilities with regards to S-Corporations, the tax code looks to the individual’s ownership rights in the company.  An employee who owns 2% or more of the S-Corporation is deemed to be an Employee/Owner, while one who owns less than 2% is treated as only an employee.  

On Behalf of an Employee (Less than 2% Shareholder)
Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance premiums paid by a S-Corporation on behalf of an employee are fully deductible providing the S-Corporation retains no interest in the policy. This would also apply to premiums paid on behalf of the employee’s spouse and other tax dependents.

 On Behalf of an Employee/Owner (Shareholder of 2% or greater)
Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance premiums paid by an S-Corporation on behalf of a 2%+ shareholder are deductible by the S-Corporation providing the S-Corporation retains no interest in the policy. This would also apply to premiums paid on behalf of the employee’s spouse and other tax dependents.

Tax Consequences of Employer-Paid Premiums

For an Employee
Employer-paid Long-Term Care Insurance premiums would not be included in the Employee’s gross income (IRC Sec. 106).  This would also apply to premiums paid on behalf of the employee’s spouse and other tax dependents.

For an Employee/Owner (Shareholder of 2% or greater)
The entire amount of the Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance premiums paid by the S-Corporation is includable in the employee/owner’s gross income. The same holds true for S-Corporation -paid Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance premiums paid on behalf of the employee/owner’s spouse or other tax dependents.  

In this case, the employee/owner is treated as a self-employed individual for tax purposes and the Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance premiums received would be subject to the same tax rules as apply to Sole Proprietors.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

C-Corporations

February 7th, 2010 Posted in Tax Issues | No Comments »

Business Deductibility of Employer-Paid Premiums

On Behalf of an Employee
A C-Corporation that purchases Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance on behalf of an Employee may deduct the premiums paid as an ordinary business expense. This holds true for Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance purchased for the Employee’s spouse or other tax dependent.

On Behalf of an Employee Stockholder
A C-Corporation that purchases Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance on behalf of an Employee Stockholder may deduct the premiums paid as an ordinary business expense. This holds true for Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance purchased for the Employee Stockholder’s spouse or other tax dependent. 

On Behalf of a Stockholder (Owner) Who is not an Employee
A C-Corporation that purchases Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance for a shareholder who is not an employee does not receive a deduction for the premiums paid.

Tax Consequences of C-Corp-Paid Premiums

For an Employee
Employer-paid Long-Term Care Insurance premiums would not be included in the Employee’s gross income (IRC Sec. 106). This would also apply to premiums paid on behalf of the employee’s spouse and other tax dependents.

For an Employee Stockholder
Provided that the Stockholder is also a bona fide Employee of the C-Corporation, Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance premiums paid by the C-Corporation on behalf of the Employee are fully deductible assuming the C-Corporation retains no interest in the policy. This would also apply to premiums paid on behalf of the employee’s spouse and other tax dependents.

For a Stockholder who is not an Employee
Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance premiums paid by a C-Corporation on behalf of a Stockholder who is not an Employee of the C-Corporation would represent dividend income for the Stockholder.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Partnerships

February 7th, 2010 Posted in Tax Issues | No Comments »

Business Deductibility of Partnership-Paid Premiums

On Behalf of a Partner
A Partnership that purchases Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance on behalf of a Partner may deduct the premiums paid as an ordinary business expense. This holds true for Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance purchased for the Partner’s spouse or other tax dependent.

On Behalf of an Employee
A Partnership that purchases Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance on behalf of an Employee may deduct the premiums paid as an ordinary business expense. This holds true for Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance purchased for the Employee’s spouse or other tax dependent.

Tax Consequences of Partnership-Paid Premiums

For the Employee
Employer-paid Long-Term Care Insurance premiums would not be included in the Employee’s gross income (IRC Sec. 106)

For a Partner
The entire amount of the Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance premiums paid by the Partnership is includable in the partner’s gross income. The same holds true for partnership-paid Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance premiums paid on behalf of the Partner’s spouse or other tax dependents. 

In this case, the partner is treated as a self-employed individual for tax purposes and the Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance premiums received would be subject to the same tax rules as apply to Sole Proprietors.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Sole Proprietor

February 7th, 2010 Posted in Tax Issues | No Comments »

Deductibility of Employer-Paid Premiums 
Sole Proprietors who purchase and pay for Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance policies for themselves, their spouses and their tax dependents may claim a deduction for the premiums paid as medical care expenses (IRC Sec. 162(l)(1)(A) and Sec. 213). 

Prior to tax year 2003, only a percentage of the eligible Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance premiums paid by a self-employed individual were deductible as medical care expenses. However in tax year 2003 and thereafter, the full amount of the Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance premiums paid by the self-employed individual may be deducted (IRC Sec. 162(l)(1)(B). See the following table for more information. 

Tax Year Applicable Percentage of TQ LTCI Premium
Deductible as Self-Employed Health Insurance
2010 100%

 

Further, as in the case of individual taxpayers, the amount of the Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance premiums that a self-employed individual may deduct as Self-Employed Health Insurance is subject to the following dollar limits. 

Age Eligible Premium 2010 Limit Eligible Premium 2009 Limit
< 40 $330 $320
41 – 50 $620 $600
51 – 60 $1,230 $1,190
61 – 70 $3,290 $3,180
> 70 $4,110 $3,980
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Individual Taxpayers

February 7th, 2010 Posted in Tax Issues | No Comments »

Deductibility of Premium Payments
Individuals who purchase and pay for Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance policies for themselves, their spouses, and their tax dependents may claim the premiums paid as deductible personal medical expenses if the Individual itemizes his or her taxes (See Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Sec. 213(a) and IRC Sec. 213(d)(1)(D)).

However, any Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance expenses are deductible only to the extent that the individual’s total unreimbursed medical care expenses exceed 7.5% of his or her Adjusted Gross Income.

Further, the amount of the Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance premiums that may be deducted is subject to the following dollar limits based on the insured’s attained age before the close of the tax year (IRC Sec 213(d)(10)).

Age Eligible Premium 2010 Limit Eligible Premium 2009 Limit
< 40 $330 $320
41 – 50 $620 $600
51 – 60 $1,230 $1,190
61 – 70 $3,290 $3,180
> 70 $4,110 $3,980
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Tax Treatment of Benefits

February 7th, 2010 Posted in Tax Issues | No Comments »

For Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance policies that pay benefits under an Indemnity Model, benefit payments are subject to a daily dollar cap.

2010 Daily Indemnity
(Per Diem) Limit
2009 Daily Indemnity
(Per Diem) Limit
2008 Daily Indemnity
(Per Diem) Limit
$290 $280 $270

If the individual taxpayer receives Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance benefits in excess of this annual daily limit, those “excess benefits” will be considered income for tax purposes. However, the taxpayer may exclude from income the “excess benefits” to the extent of the individual’s actual unreimbursed Tax-Qualified Long-Term Care expenses.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Indemnity Model

February 7th, 2010 Posted in Tax Issues | No Comments »

Indemnity Model policies pay the insured person a flat amount regardless of the amount of the insured person’s expenses.

Indemnity Example 1

Judy purchases an Indemnity Long-Term Care Insurance Policy with coverage of $150 per day. Judy later needs Home Health Care services and the cost is $80 per day. Judy’s Indemnity insurance coverage would pay her $150 per day of service even though her expenses are only $80. Judy can use the extra $70 in any way she sees fit.

Indemnity Example 2

Len purchases an Indemnity Long-Term Care Insurance Policy with coverage of $150 per day. Len later needs Home Health Care services and the cost is $200 per day. Len’s Indemnity insurance coverage would pay him $150 per day of service even though his expenses are $200. Len would be financially responsible for the extra $50.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button